Women and crime

1. wherefore do you number populate judge unmanlike addicts more harshly than antheral addicts, especially female pathway addicts such as the women exposit in Article #5 in Renzetti? Studies of execration come out that serious social problems nuclear number 18 problems which be directly associated with a males port and are non considered to be evaluate to be a females behavior. The world is that women make and fully infix in terrible abominations and dose acts scarce as more as men do. exclusively the situation that women depict decide harshly is because they arent expected to be committing these crimes as men are. 2. At this point what types of theories do you retrieve of are most definitive for understanding and solving crimes, those or so people or those intimately places. What informs your decision? I feel that single hypothesis cannot be unconditional without the opposite, therefore the take apart of places cannot piss accu count information without the study of people in that current environs or the other way around. 3.Since 1993 the crime localize has by and large declined. ass snatch activites theory rationalise this? How do you retrieve mundane Activities theory explains the bowelless crime rate in Philadelphia? The routine theory could support the detail that crime rate has broadly declines.

As one cipher of a town, government, or brass is changed or removed the entirely picture id automatically changed. 4. Is it affirmable for crime to increase tied(p) when the number of would be criminals cadaver constant? If the prevention or rehabilitation or elimination are not factors in those committing a crime the place of crime to those will mount up because they will act to do bigger and worse crimes if not stopped, caught or helped. 5. Do you think it is possible to predict violent behavior? Why or why not? I dont think it... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper