Flag Desecration Amendment

Central Texas College Political round off One slacken off sacrilege Amendment Dr. Karen Waugh Jamorion Stanford 9/17/2012 fall blasphemy The Ameri elicit swag is one of the most recognizable symbols this coun set about has today. As children, we learn in school to cross our heart with our correct reach out and recite the pledge of allegiance to the United States of America, while facing the flag, a beloved symbol. As a soldier in the United States Army, I proudly wear a flag as a check of my Army Combat Uni image (ACU). It is worn by soldiers like me to instal the love of country, honor and commitment to this great solid ground.It is cherished by veterans who piddle fought for this country, and families of the fallen soldiers cherish it because it is a symbol that their loved one illogical their life for this country. With all the great things the American flag stands for in this country, where does the right to desecrate it stand? Is it indeed a form for a someone or mortals to converse their right of liberty of speech by the premiere Amendment, or an outright disrespect of a national nourish that should be protected at all costs? If so, what are those costs? rowlock desecration doesnt come as an easy choice.One would think that this would be the case, barely in reality the decision is precisely non a simple. The decision by Congress on whether to protect the flag from desecration is non that cut and dry. Many views must be interpreted into affection when delving into this issue. On one side you have the supporters whose arguments include, that burning the flag dishonors American who fought and died for this country, the 49 states that have called for Congress to pass the Amendment, and the forcefulness dramatizen form Congress to protect the flag by the Supreme Court in 1989, was wrong and needs correcting.The opponents arguments suggest that passing such(prenominal)(prenominal) an Amendment would alter our nations history for the first time, that there is non enough to confirm making such a change to a big farewell of the First Amendment, and that flag burning is rare. The next thing to do is cast all the different point of views. When an image of the flag being profane is shown, many of us whether you served in the military or non, cant help but feel disrespected. This holds true for supporters of the Flag Desecration Amendments.For Americans who fought and calm fight for this country, an act of desecrating the flag is a slap in the expect to the service they provide and the sacrifices they have made while serving. The flag is a national treasure not just a cloth with colour and stripes. It is symbol that stands for independence and unites this country. Supports for the Flag Desecration Amendment strongly believe that such a national treasure should be upheld and backed by sex act, so much so that 49 states have called to Congress asking that the Flag Desecration Amendment be passed.The Flag Dese cration Amendment reads Congress shall have the power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States. (How a particle Decides to Vote) The power to protect the flag is believed by supporters to have been wrongfully taken from Congress by the Supreme Court in 1989. Passing the Flag Desecration Amendment would reverse that action, and protect the sacred symbol. This amendment is about restoring a freedom to the people. The peoples freedom to protect their flag, a freedom they enjoyed and exercised for 100 years. Flag burn mark Debate and Poll) Supporters reasons of the proposed Amendment are convincing, like those of Brooke Brown, a cardinal year old, who wrote about the flag being a national treasure and that it should be protected, support even from a child are convincing, but there are always two sides to a story. Opponents of the Flag Desecration Amendment, propose reasons that make sense in not passing such an amendment and in doing so would lead to an u ltimate betrayal of the freedoms granted to us by the First Amendment.In passing the Flag Desecration Amendment, it would mean that if a person wanted to express political freedom of speech by desecrating the flag they could not. A proposed Amendment would undermine the First Amendment. As Americans we are granted many freedoms and the freedom of speech is a major one, so if congress were to say that a person could not express themselves and to have it in writing then what else would change. Opponents likewise make a point that flag burning is rare.They say that is doesnt happen every year, but when it has that it was to express political speech as the Supreme Court held in 1989. Opponents also say that once freedoms such as this be taken extraneous then whats to say what else congress will regulate and battlefield to violations. Anna Ross, form the How a Member Decides to Vote module mentions, that while it efficacy make us mad to pay heed our flag being desecrated, it is not dear(p) enough reason to weaken one of the most important principals of democracy.The module simulation was very informative the how a member decides to pick out module shows the steps that are taken by a person in congress on voting for such a change. The handle is difficult, it takes a bit of personal beliefs and also being able to be objective and have the rights of the people in mind. One must be open-minded and not be subjected by a single side. The good of all should be considered when taking a vote on a matter such as the Flag Desecration Amendment.Considering the thoughts and feeling of those for the amendment such as what it mode to Americans who serve for the symbol of the flag, the 49 states that have called for a change, and for those that think a decision needs to be corrected, while not forgetting that with a passage comes a history altering change, considering that a desecration action is not a common everyday occurrence, and that there is not enough to justify undermining the freedoms given to Americans through the First Amendment.No one likes to see the symbol of our nation, the one that unites us being hurt it is not just a piece of fabric with colors on it, but a symbol that stands for freedom. The module shows how difficult a task this can be to undertake and personal beliefs and public interest can conflict, so it goes without saying, can we protect our symbol while upholding the First Amendment? I learned that initially I was for the Flag Desecration Amendment, it must be protected, but as I considered all the views presented surprisingly, I found that I voted NAY.I thought, although I proudly wear a flag on my ACUs, the flag was not the freedom itself but a symbol. The first amendment grants freedoms and to vote for the Flag Desecration Amendment, would take a specific freedom away. Although I fight for this country, this country is not the flag itself, it is a symbol, but what it stands for is the many freedoms granted in which I believe are the bigger picture.The combination of these points as a tout ensemble need to be considered by congressmen and women when casting a vote on this difficult subject, one must take into account all points and try not let his or her own views be the only means on which to vote. Works Cited Flag Burning Debate, Political Debates and Polls Forum, kinsfolk 17, 2012, http//www. youdebate. com/DEBATES/FLAG_BURNING. HTM The Center on Congress at Indiana University and work the How a Member Votes module, September 17, 2012, http//congress. indiana. edu/interactive-learning-modules, Central Texas College Blackboard