Bigamy & Alimony Essay

If fact of offset trade union was concealed from the married person enclosure of imprisonment may extend to 10 years In Sarla Mudgal v UOI nervous strain 1995 SC 1531, the SC criticized the practice of conversion to Islam for the sake of promise II polygamous matrimony coz that enables them to marry again without getting their first marriage dissolved.The ruling was reaffirmed in the case of Lily Thomas v UOI tonal pattern 2000 SC 1650. Also held plurality of marriage is non unconditional even off conferred on the Muslim husband. There is a precondition that he should kick in the capacity to do justice between the co-wives. Under Hanafi Law 5 marriages are not void but merely irregular and give the axe be regularized by divorcing one wife. Exception a Sunni taking a fifth wife is not guilty of Bigamy u/s 494, 495 of IPC ( Shahumeedu v Subajda ( 1970)But a Shia Husband who takes 5th marriage (where 5th marriage is void) can be prosecuted for bigamy. So, one who marries during the lifetime of his or her spouse commits an offensive activity of bigamy provided his first marriage is not unserviceable & void. In M. M. Malhotra v UOI AIR 2006 SC 80, Husband married a woman whose marriage was in subsistence but was void.Hence, held subsequent marriage would not be bigamous. If former marriage is voidable, then also bigamy is committed. Varadrajan v State of Madras AIR 1965 SC 1964, Bigamy where necessary formalities of marriage have been performed at the time of the solemnization of II marriage. Priya v Suresh AIR 1971 SC 1153, held second marriage cannot be handle to be proved by mere admission of parties.Performance of clutch ceremonies is to be proved. Dr. D.N. Mukherji v State AIR 1969 All. 486, held performance of some handle ceremony is not enough and, therefore, prosecution of bigamy will fail. So bigamous marriage is void under H, Christian and Parsi laws. Under SMA declaration of nullity of marriage can be obtained by either company.Th e spouse of initiatorymarriage has no right to file a petition for nullity. touch on is to file a declaratory suit to that effect u/s 34 of the Special Relief Act, 1963. Under Matrimonial law the spouse of initiative marriage may sue for dissolution on the landed estate that other party is living in adultery u/s 13 (1) (i) of HMA. Law Commission of IndiaIn 227th report, given on 5th Aug.2009, recommended in HMA afterwards S. 17 ( punishment) S. 17 A be inserted that a married person, who is governed by this Act cannot marry again even after changing religion, unless- i. 1st one is dissolved orii. Declared null and voidIn accordance with law.And if such a marriage is assure it will be null & void and Shall attract application of S. 494,495 of IPC.no defense can be taken in the charge of bigamy that it was a i. in good faith orii. mistake of law.Only aggrieved party can complaintBut once case is filed State prosecutes the bigamous spouse. Should bigamy be permitted in some lim ited cases?In Goa, Daman & Diu during Portuguese line up Hindi Husband was permitted to take II wife during the lifetime of 1st one but i. in specified casesii. With the consent of wifeKane (in tarradiddle of Dharmashstra) suggested it should be tolerated for some classes on economic grounds. Derrett also supports (Critique of Modern Hindu Law)Some arguments hold good for polyandry also, but present writers do not support this view.iii.